David Benjamin db421c2d80 More clearly suggest passing NULL for EC and EC_KEY APIs
We didn't note they could be NULL in some APIs. Also almost all of EC
ignores BN_CTX anyway, so we can just say it's ignored. For the handful
of functions that don't ignore it, I think we can probably just say it
hint that you can pass in NULL and, if you think you have something
useful to do with BN_CTX, you probably know what it's used for.

(But also we should just remove the EC code's dependency on BN_CTX.
BN_CTX is really only useful when you call lots and lots of BIGNUM-using
operations in a row, and neither of the remaining such operations fall
under that umbrella.)

Bug: 42290433
Change-Id: I2766b310ca1d28a67e45354111cc2d90fa45f113
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/79988
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Auto-Submit: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2025-06-30 15:51:05 -07:00
2025-04-16 11:55:50 -07:00
2025-05-27 13:00:47 -07:00
2024-10-25 18:37:59 +00:00
2024-04-26 22:19:48 +00:00
2025-02-13 09:45:44 -08:00
2025-01-15 17:02:35 -08:00
2024-12-17 07:37:45 -08:00
2025-03-20 03:41:54 -07:00
2025-04-14 16:16:34 -07:00
2025-04-14 16:16:34 -07:00
2025-04-14 16:16:31 -07:00
2025-05-14 15:04:40 -07:00
2024-06-21 04:01:30 +00:00
2025-03-19 23:44:21 -07:00

BoringSSL

BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.

Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.

Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.

BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.

Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.

Project links:

To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.

There are other files in this directory which might be helpful:

S
Description
Mirror of BoringSSL
Readme Multiple Licenses 332 MiB
Languages
C++ 39.1%
Assembly 25.4%
C 13.8%
Go 9.1%
Raku 5.2%
Other 7.3%